Abstract: Background and importance: The differentiation between patients who require urgent care and those who could receive adequate care through ambulatory services remains a challenge in managing patient volumes in emergency departments (ED). Different approaches were pursued to characterize patients that could safely divert to ambulatory care. However, this characterization remains challenging as the urgency upon presentation is assessed based on immediately available characteristics of the patients rather than on subsequent diagnoses. This work employs a core set of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (core-ACSCs) in an ED to describe conditions that do not require inpatient care if treated adequately in the ambulatory care sector. It subsequently analyzes the corresponding triage levels and admission status to determine whether core-ACSCs relevantly contribute to patient volumes in an ED. Settings and participants: Single center cross-sectional analysis of routine data of a tertiary ED in 2019. Outcome measures and analysis: The proportion of core-ACSCs among all presentations was assessed. Triage levels were binarily classified as "urgent" and "non-urgent," and the distribution of core-ACSCs in both categories was studied. Additionally, the patients presenting with core-ACSCs requiring inpatient care were assessed based on adjusted residuals and logistic regression. The proportion being discharged home underwent further investigation. Main results: This study analyzed 43,382 cases of which 10.79% (n = 4,683) fell under the definition of core-ACSC categories. 65.2% of all core-ACSCs were urgent and received inpatient care in 62.8% of the urgent cases. 34.8% of the core-ACSCs were categorized as non-urgent, 92.4% of wich were discharged home. Age, triage level and sex significantly affected the odds of requiring hospital admission after presenting with core-ACSCs. The two core-ACSCs that mainly contributed to non-urgent cases discharged home after the presentation were "back pain" and "soft tissue disorders." Discussion: Core-ACSCs contribute relevantly to overall ED patient volume but cannot be considered the primary drivers of crowding. However, once patients presented to the ED with what was later confirmed as a core-ACSC, they required urgent care in 65.2%. This finding highlights the importance of effective ambulatory care to avoid emergency presentations. Additionally, the core-ACSC categories "back pain" and "soft tissue disorders" were often found to be non-urgent and discharged home. Although further research is required, these core-ACSCs could be considered potentially avoidable ED presentations. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered in the German trials register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00029751) on 2022-07-22

Abstract: PURPOSE We evaluated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for detecting tumor burden in melanoma and examined whether early changes in the number of ctDNA copies predict response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 12 patients with stage III and 50 patients with stage IV melanoma with BRAF exon 15 or NRAS exon 3 mutations in tumor tissue. We used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction to retrospectively analyze serial plasma samples for mutation-positive ctDNA. RESULTS Matched plasma and serum samples were positive for ctDNA, lactate dehydrogenase, and S100 in 113 (45.8%), 108 (43.7%; not significant), and 58 (23.5%; P .0001) of 247 samples from 50 patients with stage IV melanoma, and in 17 (63%), eight (29.6%; P = .014), and five (18.5%; P .0001) of 27 samples from 12 patients with stage III melanoma. The number of mutant ctDNA copies correlated with concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase (r = 0.50) and S100 (r = 0.64), tumor volume (r2 = 0.58), and tumor metabolic activity (r2 = 0.83). Within 30 days before surgery, initiation of treatment, or change in treatment, ctDNA, LDH, and S100 were positive in 76.8%, 53.6% (P = .01), and 46.4% (P .001) of patients, respectively. In patients with stage III or IV melanoma, early changes in ctDNA within 1 month after initiation of treatment correctly predicted RECIST response categories in 19 of 20 patients. Detectable ctDNA within 30 days after surgery or initiation of systemic treatment predicted inferior progression-free survival in patients with stage III disease (P = .018). In patients with stage IV disease, 10 or more copies of ctDNA per mL at first follow-up indicated shorter progression-free survival (3.8 v 9 months; hazard ratio, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.56 to 10.53).

Abstract: Molecular precision oncology faces two major challenges: first, to identify relevant and actionable molecular variants in a rapidly changing field and second, to provide access to a broad patient population. Here, we report a four-year experience of the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg (Germany) including workflows and process optimizations. This retrospective single-center study includes data on 488 patients enrolled in the MTB from February 2015 through December 2018. Recommendations include individual molecular diagnostics, molecular stratified therapies, assessment of treatment adherence and patient outcomes including overall survival. The majority of MTB patients presented with stage IV oncologic malignancies (90.6%) and underwent an average of 2.1 previous lines of therapy. Individual diagnostic recommendations were given to 487 patients (99.8%). A treatment recommendation was given in 264 of all cases (54.1%) which included a molecularly matched treatment in 212 patients (43.4%). The 264 treatment recommendations were implemented in 76 patients (28.8%). Stable disease was observed in 19 patients (25.0%), 17 had partial response (22.4%) and five showed a complete remission (6.6%). An objective response was achieved in 28.9% of cases with implemented recommendations and for 4.5% of the total population (22 of 488 patients). By optimizing the MTB workflow, case-discussions per session increased significantly while treatment adherence and outcome remained stable over time. Our data demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of molecular-guided personalized therapy for cancer patients in a clinical routine setting showing a low but robust and durable disease control rate over time

Abstract: Background: Mutations in cKIT or PDGFRA are found in up to 90% of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Previously, we described the design, validation, and clinical performance of a digital droplet (dd)PCR assay panel for the detection of imatinib-sensitive cKIT and PDFGRA mutations in circulating tumor (ct)DNA. In this study, we developed and validated a set of ddPCR assays for the detection of cKIT mutations mediating resistance to cKIT kinase inhibitors in ctDNA. In addition, we cross-validated these assays using next generation sequencing (NGS). Methods: We designed and validated five new ddPCR assays to cover the most frequent cKIT mutations mediating imatinib resistance in GISTs. For the most abundant imatinib-resistance-mediating mutations in exon 17, a drop-off, probe-based assay was designed. Dilution series (of decreasing mutant (MUT) allele frequency spiked into wildtype DNA) were conducted to determine the limit of detection (LoD). Empty controls, single wildtype controls, and samples from healthy individuals were tested to assess specificity and limit of blank (LoB). For clinical validation, we measured cKIT mutations in three patients and validated results using NGS. Results: Technical validation demonstrated good analytical sensitivity, with a LoD ranging between 0.006% and 0.16% and a LoB ranging from 2.5 to 6.7 MUT fragments/mL. When the ddPCR assays were applied to three patients, the abundance of ctDNA in serial plasma samples reflected the individual disease course, detected disease activity, and indicated resistance mutations before imaging indicated progression. Digital droplet PCR showed good correlation to NGS for individual mutations, with a higher sensitivity of detection. Conclusions: This set of ddPCR assays, together with our previous set of cKIT and PDGFRA mutations assays, allows for dynamic monitoring of cKIT and PDGFRA mutations during treatment. Together with NGS, the GIST ddPCR panel will complement imaging of GISTs for early response evaluation and early detection of relapse, and thus it might facilitate personalized decision-making

Abstract: Purpose Dramatic advances in our understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of cancer, along with a rapidly expanding portfolio of molecular targeted drugs, have led to a paradigm shift toward personalized, biomarker-driven cancer treatment. Here, we report the 2-year experience of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), one of the first interdisciplinary molecular tumor conferences established in Europe. The role of the MTB is to recommend personalized therapy for patients with cancer beyond standard-of-care treatment. Methods This retrospective case series includes 198 patients discussed from March 2015 through February 2017. The MTB guided individual molecular diagnostics, assessed evidence of actionability of molecular alterations, and provided therapy recommendations, including approved and off-label treatments as well as available matched clinical trials. Results The majority of patients had metastatic solid tumors (73.7%), mostly progressive (77.3%) after a mean of 2.0 lines of standard treatment. Diagnostic recommendations resulted in 867 molecular diagnostic tests for 172 patients (five per case), including exome analysis in 36 cases (18.2%). With a median turnaround time of 28 days, treatment recommendations were given to 104 patients (52.5%). These included single-agent targeted therapies (42.3%), checkpoint inhibitors (37.5%), and combination therapies (18.3%). Treatment recommendations were implemented in 33 of 104 patients (31.7%), of whom 19 (57.6%) showed stable disease or partial response, including 14 patients (7.1% of the entire population) receiving off-label treatments. Conclusion Personalized extended molecular-guided patient care is effective for a small but clinically meaningful proportion of patients in challenging clinical situations. Limited access to targeted drugs, lack of trials, and submission at late disease stage prevents broader applicability, whereas genome-wide analyses are not a strict requirement for predictive molecular testing

Abstract: Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is a specific subtype of lung cancer presenting as highly metastatic disease with extremely poor prognosis. Despite responding initially well to chemo- or radiotherapy, SCLC almost invariably relapses and develops resistance to chemotherapy. This is suspected to be related to tumor cell subpopulations with different characteristics resembling stem cells. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is known to play a key role in metastatic processes and in developing drug resistance. This is also true for NSCLC, but there is very little information on EMT processes in SCLC so far. SCLC, in contrast to NSCLC cell lines, grow mainly in floating cell clusters and a minor part as adherent cells. We compared these morphologically different subpopulations of SCLC cell lines for EMT and epigenetic features, detecting significant differences in the adherent subpopulations with high levels of mesenchymal markers such as Vimentin and Fibronectin and very low levels of epithelial markers like E-cadherin and Zona Occludens 1. In addition, expression of EMT-related transcription factors such as Snail/Snai1, Slug/Snai2, and Zeb1, DNA methylation patterns of the EMT hallmark genes, functional responses like migration, invasion, matrix metalloproteases secretion, and resistance to chemotherapeutic drug treatment all differed significantly between the sublines. This phenotypic variability might reflect tumor cell heterogeneity and EMT during metastasis in vivo , accompanied by the development of refractory disease in relapse. We propose that epigenetic regulation plays a key role during phenotypical and functional changes in tumor cells and might therefore provide new treatment options for SCLC patients