Abstract: Data on therapy of COVID-19 in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed children are scarce. We aimed to explore management strategies of pediatric rheumatologists. All subscribers to international Pediatric Rheumatology Bulletin Board were invited to take part in an online survey on therapeutic approaches to COVID-19 in healthy children and children with autoimmune/inflammatory diseases (AID). Off-label therapies would be considered by 90.3% of the 93 participating respondents. In stable patients with COVID-19 on oxygen supply (stage I), use of remdesivir (48.3%), azithromycin (26.6%), oral corticosteroids (25.4%) and/or hydroxychloroquine (21.9%) would be recommended. In case of early signs of "cytokine storm" (stage II) or in critically ill patients (stage III) (a) anakinra (79.5% stage II; 83.6% stage III) or tocilizumab (58.0% and 87.0%, respectively); (b) corticosteroids (oral 67.2% stage II, intravenously 81.7% stage III); (c) intravenous immunoglobulins (both stages 56.5%); or (d) remdesivir (both stages 46.7%) were considered. In AID, > 94.2% of the respondents would not support a preventive adaptation of the immunomodulating therapy. In case of mild COVID-19, more than 50% of the respondents would continue pre-existing treatment with immunoglobulins (100%), hydroxychloroquine (94.2%), anakinra (79.2%) or canakinumab (72.5%), or tocilizumab (69.8%). Long-term corticosteroids would be reduced by 26.9% ( = 2 mg/kg/d) and 50.0% ( 2 mg/kg/day), respectively, with only 5.8% of respondents voting to discontinue the therapy. Conversely, more than 75% of respondents would refrain from administering cyclophosphamide and anti-CD20-antibodies. As evidence on management of pediatric COVID-19 is incomplete, continuous and critical expert opinion and knowledge exchange is helpful

Abstract: Introduction: Durability of immune protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 remains enigmatic, especially in the pediatric population and in the context of immune-evading variants of concern. Obviously, this knowledge is required for measures to contain the spread of infection and in selecting rational preventive measures. Methods: Here, we investigated the serum neutralization capacity of 36 seropositive adults and 34 children approximately one year after infection with the ancestral Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 by using a pseudovirus neutralization assay. Results: We found that 88.9% of seropositive adult (32/36) and 94.1% of seropositive children (32/34) convalescents retained the neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain (WT). Although, the neutralization effect against Omicron BA.1 (B.1.1.529.1) was significantly lower, 70.6% (24/34) of children and 41.7% (15/36) of adults possessed BA.1 cross-neutralizing antibodies. The spike 1 (S1)-specific T cell recall capacity using an activation-induced marker assay was analyzed in 18 adults and 16 children. All participants had detectable S1-specific CD4 T cells against WT, and 72.2% (13/18) adults and 81,3% (13/16) children had detectable S1 WT-specific CD8 T cells. CD4 cross-reactivity against BA.1 was demonstrated in all investigated adults (18/18), and 66.7% (12/18) adult participants had also detectable specific CD8 BA.1 T cells while we detected BA.1 S1 reactive CD4 and CD8 T cells in 81.3% (13/16) children. Discussion: Together, our findings demonstrate that infection with the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 in children as well as in adults induces robust serological as well as T cell memory responses that persist over at least 12 months. This suggests persistent immunological memory and partial cross-reactivity against Omicron BA.1

Abstract: Background and aims Immunosuppressed patients are at risk of severe infections with vaccination preventable diseases. We evaluated vaccination rate and immunity of children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Methods Immunization rate of 329 children with IBD (n = 300) and AIH (n = 29) was assessed in seven German centres using vaccination certificates, history of chicken pox and by determining anti-varicella zoster virus (VZV) and anti-measles IgG antibodies. Results Of the total cohort 86% received long-term immunosuppression. Four doses of a hexavalent vaccine were documented in 89%, at least one dose of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination was documented in 325 (99%), with 300 (92%) receiving two doses. Anti-measles IgG concentrations were insufficient in 11% of the immunized patients. VZV vaccination was officially recommended in Germany since 2004, and implemented in 88% born from 2005 onwards. In patients born earlier VZV catch up vaccination only reached 25% (n = 67). Of 118 patients with documented VZV vaccination 25 (21%) did not display sufficient anti-VZV IgG. Of 198 patients with a history of chicken pox, six had undetectable anti-VZV IgG. Of 29 patients having neither had chicken pox nor VZV vaccination, 20 were found to have sufficient anti-VZV IgG. Conclusions In our cohort vaccination coverage for hexavalent and MMR vaccinations was good, but insufficient for VZV vaccination in patients born before 2005. Neither the vaccination certificate nor the history of chicken pox is reliable to predict VZV immunity indicating a need for serologic investigations and if needed vaccination before initiating immunosuppressive therapy

Die Kinder- und Jugendmedizin trägt wesentlich zu einer besseren Ausgangslage für ein langes Leben in Gesundheit mit hoher Lebensqualität bei, denn die Grundlagen für viele chronische Erkrankungen im Erwachsenenalter werden bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter gelegt. Die Forschung in der Kinder- und Jugendmedizin hat jedoch Besonderheiten im Vergleich zur Erwachsenenmedizin: sie befasst sich, erstens, mit den Mechanismen der vorgeburtlichen und frühen Prägung; zweitens, mit Krankheitsmechanismen in Phasen der Organentwicklung, Organdifferenzierung und Organfunktionsreifung; drittens, mit den im Vergleich zum Erwachsenenalter wesentlich häufiger fassbaren genetischen Ursachen von Krankheiten und, viertens, nicht mit Volkskrankheiten, sondern mit seltenen Erkrankungen. Forschungsergebnisse aus der Kinder- und Jugendmedizin führen oft zu Erkenntnissen, die auch für Erkrankungen in späteren Lebensaltern relevant sind - sie bilden die Grundlage für die therapeutischen Maßnahmen im Sinne einer individualisierten Medizin oder besser: einer Präzisionsmedizin. Um diese großen Herausforderungen auch vor dem Hintergrund signifikant reduzierter Ressourcen in der Universitätsmedizin zu meistern, bedeutet das für die Kinder- und Jugendmedizin: Kräfte bündeln und diejenigen Forschungs- und Innovationsziele benennen, welche die Kinderund Jugendmedizin als Querschnittsbereich krankheitsübergreifend mit anderen Disziplinen wie der Geburtsmedizin, der Humangenetik und Molekulargenetik verfolgt. Das Ziel ist es, die qualitätsgesicherte Translation in der Prävention, Diagnose, Therapie und Versorgung von Krankheiten bei Kindern- und Jugendlichen sicherzustellen und zu beschleunigen.