A model of the use of the platinum group metals (PGMs) platinum, palladium, and rhodium in Europe has been developed and combined with a model of the environmental pressures related to PGM production. Compared to the base case presented in Part I of this pair of articles, potential changes in PGM production and use are quantified with regard to cumulative and yearly environmental impacts and PGM resource use, for the period 20052020. Reducing sulfur dioxide (SO) emissions of PGM producer Norilsk Nickel could cut the cumulative SO emissions associated with the use of PGMs in Europe by 35%. Cleaner electricity generation in South Africa could reduce cumulative SO emissions by another 9%. Increasing the recycling rate of end-of-life catalytic converters to 70% in 2020 could save 15% of the cumulative primary PGM input into car catalysts and 10% of the SO emissions associated with PGM production. In 2020, PGM requirements and SO emissions would be, respectively, 40% and 22% lower than the base case. Substituting palladium for part of the platinum in diesel catalysts, coupled with a probable palladium price increase, could imply 15% more cumulative SO emissions if recycling rates do not increase. A future large-scale introduction of fuel cell vehicles would require technological improvements to significantly reduce the PGM content of the fuel cell stack. The basic design of such vehicles greatly influences the vehicle power, a key parameter in determining the total PGM requirement.

In this article, we analyze flows of the platinum group metals (PGMs) platinum, palladium, and rhodium and the environmental impacts associated with their supply in Europe. A model of the use of PGMs in Europe has been developed, and this is combined with a model of environmental pressures related to PGM production. Seven industrial sectors and product groups form the main users of PGMs in Europe, comprising the chemical, petroleum, and glass industries; jewelry, dentistry, electronic equipment, and car catalysts. Most relevant environmental impacts of secondary production in Europe and primary PGM production in South Africa, Russia, and Canada are taken into account, including emissions of sulphur dioxide and carbon dioxide and total material requirement. The article quantifies the PGM flows to, from, and within Europe in 2004. The automotive industry is the single largest user of primary PGMs, and catalytic converters represent the major PGM end use. The chemical and glass industries also require large amounts of PGM but rely mostly on secondary metals. The environmental impacts of primary production exceed those of secondary production by far. An analysis of the use of car catalytic converters shows that as a result of efforts to reduce air pollutant emissions in Europe, other negative environmental impacts, such as point-source pollution and mining waste, are occurring elsewherefor example, at extraction and refining sites in Siberia and South Africa.

With reference to the federal Waste Prevention Programme (WPP), the Circular Economy Act stipulates that standards for waste prevention measures must be specified to record the progress made in decoupling the effects on people and the environment associated with waste generation from economic growth. The WPP identifies possible indicators, but it is unknown to which extent they can represent waste generation or effects of waste prevention measures. Possible evaluation criteria for the measurement of waste prevention success was analysed, their suitability were tested and a set of indicators was developed to enable a continuous measurement of the success of waste prevention measures.

Das Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz (KrWG) verlangt mit Bezug auf das Abfallvermeidungsprogramm (AVP) die Benennung zweckmäßiger Maßstäbe für Abfallvermeidungsmaßnahmen (AVM), anhand derer die Fortschritte bei der Entkopplung der mit der Abfallerzeugung verbundenen Auswirkungen auf Mensch und Umwelt vom Wirtschaftswachstum erfasst werden können. Das AVP benennt mögliche Indikatoren, allerdings ist unklar, inwieweit diese das Entstehen von Abfällen darstellen oder die Effekte von AVM abbilden können. Mögliche Bewertungsmaßstäbe für die Messung des Abfallvermeidungserfolges wurden analysiert, auf ihre Eignung geprüft und ein Set an Indikatoren erarbeitet, um eine kontinuierliche Messung des Erfolges von AVM zu ermöglichen.