Abstract: Purpose The evidence-based (S3) guideline "Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas" (AWMF Registry No. 032/044OL) published by the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) covers all aspects of sarcoma treatment with 229 recommendations. Representatives of all medical specialties involved in sarcoma treatment contributed to the guideline. This paper compiles the most important recommendations for surgeons selected by delegates from the surgical societies. Methods A Delphi process was used. Delegates from the surgical societies involved in guideline process selected the 15 recommendations that were most important to them. Votes for similar recommendations were tallied. From the resulting ranked list, the 10 most frequently voted recommendations were selected and confirmed by consensus in the next step. Results The statement "Resection of primary soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities should be performed as a wide resection. The goal is an R0 resection" was selected as the most important term. The next highest ranked recommendations were the need for a preoperative biopsy, performing preoperative MRI imaging with contrast, and discussing all cases before surgery in a multidisciplinary sarcoma committee. Conclusion The evidence-based guideline "Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas" is a milestone to improve the care of sarcoma patients in Germany. The selection of the top ten recommendations by surgeons for surgeons has the potential to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the guideline and thus improve the overall outcome of sarcoma patients

Abstract: Background Nivolumab monotherapy is approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after prior therapy on the basis of results from CheckMate 025. Objective The NORA (NivOlumab in Renal cell cArcinoma) noninterventional study (NIS) aims to capture real-world data to complement the pivotal CheckMate 025 clinical trial. Design, setting, and participants NORA is a prospective, multicenter NIS in Germany. Consenting patients with aRCC of any subtype who started nivolumab after previous therapy were eligible. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary objective was to estimate overall survival (OS) in the overall population and relevant subgroups. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), the duration of response (DOR), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Baseline characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. OS and PFS were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier-method. Results and limitations A total of 228 patients with aRCC were eligible. The median age was 70 yr, 71% were male, 14% had favorable, 58% had intermediate, and 15% had poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk (12% missing information). The median follow-up was 37 mo. In the overall population, median OS was 24 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 19-28) and median PFS was 5.3 mo (95% CI 3.9-6.7). The ORR was 20% and the median DOR was 28 mo (95% CI 16-not estimable). No new safety signals emerged (46% and 15% of patients had treatment-related adverse events of all grades and grade 3-4, respectively; there was 1 treatment-related death due to liver failure). PROs did not reveal detriments during the study duration. Limitations include the lack of central pathology review and no standardization for imaging evaluation and toxicity assessment. Conclusions Effectiveness and safety in this real-world population were in line with the pivotal clinical trial and support the use of nivolumab after prior systemic therapy in a broad aRCC population